Also, i could never get on with the eye-focus which is the major difference between the two. I tried both before i bought mine, and just prefered the 1V. As far as the choice goes - I use a 1V, a very close friend has the 3. I've had mine for about 6months and my god is it good! Autofocus is instant and silent. Personally, being a Canon user I am probably biased however, the 70-200 2.8 L IS lens is the sharpest of its kind from any manufacturer.
Well, this old chestnut again! At the end of the day it's personal choice - as Pete said, try them all and see. The chance to try things is worth the saving. Just another point on courtesy if the shop is very helpful and is willing to spend time with you so you can try lots of things don't then buy from a different dealer down the road because you'll save a few quid. Look for a low light area in the shop that will come close to the levels you want to shoot in and point at different parts of the shop to see how each cope. If you go early on in the day (or later in the afternoon) when the shop isn't busy they will find it easier to spend more time with you than at a busy lunch period. Both Minoltas will have a similar speed so try the Dynax 7 against the Nikon and Canon. To be sure about focusing I would find a friendly dealer and ask to check out each for speed using a 70-200mm lens. A more important decision may come down to features and whether the available accessories will suit your future requirements.
But these days all three are similar and it would be hard to pick a winner. In the past I would have said Canon had the best aufofocus speed, followed closely behind by Minolta, with Nikon lagging at the back.
0 kommentar(er)
